Clinton attorney’s indictment reveals ‘bag of tricks’

0

The 26-page indictment of former cybersecurity lawyer and Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann by special counsel John durhamJohn Durham Attorney indicted in Durham probe pleads not guilty Lawyer charged with lying to FBI in Durham probe Durham seeks charge of lawyer linked to Democrats: reports MORE is as detailed as it is damning about the alleged effort to push a false claim of collusion with Russia ahead of the 2016 presidential campaign. One phrase, however, seems to resonate with those of us who have followed this scandal for years: ” You realize we’ll have to lay out all the stuff we have in our bag. “

This warning from an anonymous “academic researcher” captures the most fascinating aspect of the indictment by describing a type of Nixonian dirty trick carried out by – or at least billed to – the Clinton campaign. Along with Nixon, his personal attorney and the Committee to Re-elect the President (CREEP) paid for agents to engage in disruptive and ultimately criminal behavior targeting his opponents. Along with Clinton, the indictment (and previous disclosures) suggest that lawyers for the Clinton campaign at law firm Perkins Coie helped stage an effort to spread stories of Russian collusion and trigger an investigation.

Durham accuses Sussmann of lying to the FBI Attorney General in September 2016 when Sussmann delivered documents and data to the FBI supposedly to support a claim that Russian bank Alpha was used as a direct intermediary between the Trump campaign and the Kremlin. According to Durham, Sussman told the FBI General Counsel he is not passing the information on behalf of any client. The indictment not only details the multiple billings of the Clinton campaign as data was collected and documents created, but it claims that Sussman billed the campaign for the actual meeting with the FBI. At the time, Perkins Coie’s attorney, Marc Elias, was general counsel for the Clinton campaign. The two men have since left the company.

The big thing in 2016 was the general effort to create a collusion scandal in Russia with the help of Justice Ministry insiders and enthusiastic and empowering media.

It was not until last October, for example, that we learned then-president obamaBarack Hussein Obama Chelsea Manning Tests Positive for COVID-19 The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by National Industries for the Blind – Security strengthened for Capitol rally; Biden agenda slows down Obama backs Trudeau in Canadian election MORE was informed by his CIA director, John Brennan, of an intelligence report which Hillary ClintonHillary Diane Rodham Clinton Lawyer Indicted in Durham Inquiry Pleads Not Guilty Lawyer Charged with Lying to FBI in Durham Inquiry Durham seeks indictment of Democrats-linked lawyer : PLUS reports planned to tie up the candidate of the time Donald trumpDonald TrumpOvernight Defense & National Security – The Pentagon’s Deadly Mistake Overnight Energy & Environment – Presented by Climate Power – Interior returns BLM headquarters to Washington France draws ambassadors to the United States and Australia to protest the deal on the submarines in Russia as “a way to distract the public from its use of a private mail server”. It was July 28, 2016, three days before the investigation into Russia began.

The problem was that the Steele case and the Alpha Bank allegations collapsed shortly after being forwarded to the FBI. A key source for dossier compiler and former British spy Christopher Steele was viewed by the US Secret Service as a Russian agent, and the Clinton campaign and the dossier were believed to be used by the Russian Secret Service to spread disinformation.

According to Durham, the Alpha Bank allegation collapsed before Sussmann even turned it over to the FBI. The indictment details how an anonymous “tech executive” allegedly used his authority in several internet companies to help develop this ridiculous claim. (The executive later allegedly claimed he had been promised a high-level cybersecurity job in the Clinton administration.) Notably, there were many who expressed doubts not only within the companies working on the secret project, but also among anonymous “academic researchers” who repeatedly said the argument was wrong.

Researchers were told that they shouldn’t look for evidence but just enough to “provide the basis for a very useful story.” The researchers argued, according to the indictment, that anyone familiar with Internet traffic analysis would “drill several holes” in this account, noting that what they saw likely “was not a channel. secret communication with Russian Bank-1, but “a red herring,” according to the indictment. “Researcher-1” repeated these doubts, indicates the indictment, and asked, “How do we plan to defend ourselves against criticism that it is not fraudulent trafficking that we are observing?” There is no answer to that. Suppose again that they are not smart enough to disprove our “best case scenario”. You realize we’ll have to lay out all the stuff we have in our bag to make even a very weak association. ”

“Researcher-1” also reportedly warned, “We technically cannot make claims that would be subject to public scrutiny. The only thing that motivates us at this point is that we just don’t like [Trump]. It will not fly in the public eye. My friends, I’m afraid we have tunnel vision. Time to regroup?

Clinton herself has discussed the allegations as if they were the product of independent detectives. Just before the 2016 election, she tweeted: “Computer scientists have apparently discovered a secret server connecting the Trump Organization to a bank based in Russia.”

The indictment details a side-operation to the infamous Steele case, which also featured a model of working with FBI insiders while denying links to the campaign.

The Clinton team denied any involvement in the creation of the Steele dossier throughout the 2016 campaign, despite direct media inquiries. It was only after the election that the mysterious expenses of his legal adviser led journalists to uncover the truth. Payments for the case were masked as “legal fees” among the $ 5.6 million paid to the law firm. According to New York Times reporter Ken Vogel, Elias categorically denied any involvement in the anti-Trump dossier; when Vogel tried to relate the story he said Elias “vigorously rebuffed saying “You (or your sources) are wrong. ‘ “Times reporter Maggie HabermanMaggie Lindsy Haberman Juan Williams: Trump’s coup attempt should prevent him from running in 2024 The Hill 12:30 p.m. report – Brought to you by Facebook – Agents give grueling and gruesome accounts of January 6 MORE later wrote that “The people involved in funding this lied about it, and morally, for a year. “

According to the indictment, Sussman told the truth – and contradicted what he initially told the FBI General Counsel – when questioned under oath in December 2017 before the Special Standing Committee on the Intelligence Chamber, telling them that he had not held the meeting alone. will but at the request of a client.

Notably, another Clinton figure pushing the Alpha Bank conspiracy was Jake sullivanJake Sullivan Senators slow down Biden with Pentagon, state defense and national security detentions: US-Australia sub-deal causes break with France France cancels DC gala angry at sub-deal by Biden: PLUS report, who now assesses intelligence reports for President BidenJoe BidenHouse The Democrat threatens to vote against the party’s spending bill if the HBCU does not receive more federal aid. Defense and National Security Overnight – Pentagon’s Deadly Mistake Haitians Stranded in Texas Prolong Biden’s Immigration Problems MORE as his national security adviser. Sullivan, Clinton’s senior policy adviser, said in an official press release of the campaign that Alpha Bank’s claim “may be the most direct link to date between Donald Trump and Moscow” and described it as the work of independent experts: “Computer scientists have apparently discovered a secret server connecting the Trump organization at a Russian-based bank. This secret hotline may be the key to unraveling the mystery of Trump’s ties to Russia … This line of communication may help explain Trump’s bizarre adoration for Vladimir PoutineVladimir Vladimirovich Poutine Hillicon Valley – Facebook “too late” to fight against climate falsehoods. “

Thus, the “very useful story” was delivered to the media and the FBI and, along with the dossier, was used to initiate the investigation into Russia which led to the appointment of a special advocate. Robert muellerRobert (Bob) Mueller Senate Democrats urge Garland not to challenge court order to release Trump’s obstruction note Why a special advocate is guaranteed if Biden chooses Yates, Cuomo or Jones as special advocate for AG Barr. The “bag of tricks” was supposed to be buried with the involvement of the Clinton campaign – until Trump’s Attorney General Bill Barr appointed Durham as his second special advocate.

Durham’s indictment of Sussman appears to have revealed a lot about how scandals are fabricated and handled in Washington. From CREEP to Clinton, lawyers found themselves in legal danger when special prosecutors found them in possession of a “bag of tricks.” A dirty trick in politics can be a nice thing for a campaign – until it boomerangs the tricksters.

Durham’s final report, meanwhile, might answer even more questions, but will Washington ever allow it to see the light of day without massive writing?

Jonathan Turley is Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. You can find his updates on Twitter @JonathanTurley.



Source link

Share.

Leave A Reply